RICBL's appeal submission to the OGZ
In the appeal submission to the Office of Gyalpoi Zimpon, RICBL intentionally singles out the transactions involving the four employees from the Case Summary (Sherchud) of the High Court Judgement while completely neglecting the other employees who are signatory to all 12 Loans and 7 BG's.
Clarification submission by Legal Representative on Appeal submission submitted earlier by CEO
English Translation of HC Judgement by RICBL
Translation of the District Court & High Court Judgement submitted to the Office of Gyalpoi Zimpon by RICBL and a comparative where RICBL made the Judgement narrow to only account CRCS/2010/84 where four employees transactions are reviewed.
RICBL's version English Translation of the District Court Judgement submitted to the Office of the Gyalpoi Zimpon
RICBL's version of the English Translation of the High Court Judgement submitted to the Office of the Gyalpoi Zimpon
The Judgement (Thuenche) and Order (Kaja) was wrongly translated
Comparison of the RICBL's version of the English Translation of the High Court Judgement submitted to the Office of the Gyalpoi Zimpon and what was supposed to be the Actual Translation.
What did RICBL actually want from 4 employees? Re-litigation?
CEO: ... but we thought that some of you seeking Kidu as individuals cud possibly result in relitigation and possible overturning of the verdict. We even hinted this option to Jigmi Namgyel and Ugyen Lham.
Follow-up letter by RICBL on approaching Higher Authorities?
RICBL Management claims that 4 employees were given a chance but does the above letter indicates if it is what RICBL management claims it to be?